Catchpoint

Best Self-hosted Alternatives to Catchpoint

A curated collection of the 2 best self hosted alternatives to Catchpoint.

Digital Experience Monitoring platform offering synthetic monitoring, real-user monitoring and network/internet performance visibility to detect outages, latency and availability issues across web applications, APIs, CDNs, DNS and backbone networks.

Alternatives List

#1
SmokePing

SmokePing

SmokePing is an active network monitoring tool that measures latency and packet loss over time, stores results in RRD, and visualizes them via a web UI with alerting.

SmokePing screenshot

SmokePing is an active monitoring system for measuring network latency, latency variation (jitter), and packet loss. It continuously runs probes, stores long-term time-series results, and presents interactive graphs via a web interface.

Key Features

  • Measures latency, latency distribution, jitter, and packet loss over time
  • RRDtool-based long-term datastore and graph generation
  • Extensible probe architecture (from ICMP ping to HTTP and custom protocols)
  • Configurable alarm system that triggers on defined latency patterns
  • Master/slave model to run measurements from multiple source locations
  • Web UI with CGI rendering and Ajax-based interactive graph navigation/zooming
  • Customizable presentation via web templates and configuration

Use Cases

  • Track ISP or site-to-site link quality and detect intermittent packet loss
  • Compare latency to the same targets from multiple locations using distributed probes
  • Alert on recurring latency spikes that impact voice, video, or critical services

SmokePing is a mature choice for long-term visibility into network performance, combining flexible probing, efficient time-series storage, and clear visualization. It fits well in NOC, homelab, and multi-site environments where understanding latency patterns matters.

1.8kstars
207forks
#2
Meshping

Meshping

Meshping measures per-target ICMP latencies, builds histograms and heatmaps, runs traceroutes with Path MTU discovery, draws SVG network maps, and exposes Prometheus metrics.

Meshping is a lightweight network monitoring service that concurrently pings multiple targets and records detailed latency histograms. It runs traceroutes, performs Path MTU discovery for each hop, and renders visual maps and heatmaps to help locate weak links and routing issues.

Key Features

  • Concurrent ICMP probing of many targets with per-target latency histograms (not simple averages)
  • Traceroute integration with hop-by-hop Path MTU discovery and AS information
  • SVG network topology maps that highlight outage locations and routing loops
  • Heatmaps and histogram visualizations for spotting multimodal latency distributions
  • Prometheus-compatible /metrics endpoint for scraping and integration with existing monitoring stacks
  • Dynamic target management (add/remove targets at runtime) and optional peering between Meshping instances
  • Docker images and a simple web UI including a mobile-friendly layout

Use Cases

  • Troubleshooting WAN and datacenter connectivity by pinpointing where latency or packet loss occurs
  • Comparing latency across multiple endpoints or monitoring locations for capacity planning and performance trends
  • Distributed measurements via peered Meshping instances to observe end-to-end behavior from multiple vantage points

Limitations and Considerations

  • ICMP probing and traceroute functionality require privileges or container capabilities (e.g., CAP_NET_RAW) to send raw packets
  • Default local storage uses SQLite, which may not scale for very large deployments or extremely high sampling rates
  • Meshping focuses on measurement and visualization; it has no built-in advanced alerting engine and relies on Prometheus or external tools for alerting
  • When deployed behind some proxies, specific proxy settings may be required for good UI responsiveness

Meshping is suited for network operators and engineers who need detailed, visual latency and path visibility without heavy infrastructure. It complements metric and alerting stacks by providing raw-response histograms, traceroutes, and topology visualizations for root-cause analysis.

162stars
10forks

Why choose an open source alternative?

  • Data ownership: Keep your data on your own servers
  • No vendor lock-in: Freedom to switch or modify at any time
  • Cost savings: Reduce or eliminate subscription fees
  • Transparency: Audit the code and know exactly what's running