Clipchamp

Best Self Hosted Alternatives to Clipchamp

A curated collection of the 3 best self hosted alternatives to Clipchamp.

Web-based video editor for creating, editing and exporting videos in a browser. Offers timeline editing, templates, stock media, trimming, transitions, text/captions, basic effects and export presets for social and business content. SaaS product.

Alternatives List

#1
OpenCut

OpenCut

Free open-source video editor for web, desktop, and mobile with timeline editing, multi-track support, real-time preview, and local-first privacy.

OpenCut screenshot

OpenCut is a community-driven, open-source video editor that implements timeline-based, multi-track editing for short- and long-form videos. It targets web, desktop, and mobile platforms and emphasizes privacy by keeping media processing local and avoiding watermarks or subscriptions.

Key Features

  • Timeline-based editing with multi-track video and audio support for assembling and trimming clips
  • Real-time preview of edits inside the editor (playback / scrubbing support)
  • No watermarks, no subscription gating—feature set aimed to remain free and open-source under an MIT license
  • Local-first privacy model: projects and media are intended to remain on-device rather than being uploaded to third-party servers
  • Web-first architecture with a Next.js + React + TypeScript web application; repository uses a monorepo structure and includes tooling for local database and caching services
  • Support for running with containerized services (Docker / Docker Compose) and a developer workflow using Bun/Node tooling

Use Cases

  • Independent creators and social-media editors who need a privacy-respecting, timeline-based editor without paywalls or watermarks
  • Teams or contributors who want to extend or customize an open-source editor (plugins, UX improvements, export/rendering backends)
  • Developers testing or embedding an editor in workflows where local processing and data control are required

Limitations and Considerations

  • Project is early-stage (alpha/beta at times cited): many advanced features (rich effects, transitions, full audio toolset, polished export workflows) are noted on the roadmap as in progress or planned
  • Running a full development instance can require additional setup (Bun or Node.js, Docker/Docker Compose, Postgres and Redis) for database and caching services
  • Some areas (preview panel features, certain export paths) have been flagged by maintainers as under active refactor and may be unstable or incomplete

OpenCut is positioned as a practical, privacy-focused alternative to paywalled consumer editors. It is community-built and actively developed; contributors can follow the repository and roadmap to see current priorities and open tasks.

45.1kstars
4.5kforks
#2
8mb.local

8mb.local

Self-hosted video compressor web app with a SvelteKit UI, FastAPI API, and Celery workers using FFmpeg with GPU acceleration (NVENC/VAAPI) and CPU fallback.

8mb.local screenshot

8mb.local is a self-hosted web application for compressing videos to a target file size with minimal effort. It provides a drag-and-drop interface, queues jobs for processing, and uses FFmpeg with hardware acceleration when available.

Key Features

  • Target-size compression presets (and custom sizes) with automatic bitrate selection
  • GPU acceleration with auto-detection (NVIDIA NVENC, Intel/AMD VAAPI on Linux) and CPU fallback
  • SvelteKit web UI with drag-and-drop uploads, presets, and advanced encode options
  • Real-time progress and streaming FFmpeg logs via Server-Sent Events (SSE)
  • Queue management (view active jobs, cancel running encodes, clear queue)
  • Automatic re-encode if output exceeds the target size beyond a tolerance
  • Job history tracking and automatic download behavior
  • Basic built-in authentication and settings management via the web UI

Use Cases

  • Compressing videos to meet upload limits for messaging apps or platforms
  • Homelab or team internal “dropbox-style” video compression pipeline
  • Batch compression with concurrency on a GPU-enabled server

Limitations and Considerations

  • Intel QSV/VAAPI device passthrough is limited on Windows WSL2; Intel acceleration is primarily for Linux hosts
  • High concurrency can be constrained by GPU encoder session limits, disk I/O, and thermal throttling

8mb.local is a practical choice for users who want a simple, performant, self-hosted video compressor with reliable hardware acceleration and clear, real-time visibility into job status and logs.

559stars
22forks
#3
PlexGifMaker

PlexGifMaker

Web app to generate GIFs from Plex media and subtitles with integrated Plex login; built on .NET 6 and provided as a Docker Compose service.

PlexGifMaker is a small web application that creates animated GIFs from media in a Plex library, leveraging available subtitle tracks to add captions. It provides integrated Plex login and runs as a .NET 6 application with a Docker Compose setup for easy deployment.

Key Features

  • Generate GIFs from items in a Plex library using the media file and subtitle timings
  • Integrated Plex authentication to access a user's Plex server
  • Built with C# and .NET 6; web UI served over HTTP
  • Distributed with a Dockerfile and Docker Compose configuration for simple setup
  • Runs on a single HTTP port (default: 9000)

Use Cases

  • Create short captioned GIF highlights from movies or TV episodes in a personal Plex collection
  • Quickly produce social or reference clips using subtitle timing for accurate captions
  • Automate generation of promotional or reaction GIFs from a private media library

Limitations and Considerations

  • The project currently serves traffic over plain HTTP only (no built-in TLS support)
  • Feature set is minimal and oriented toward single-server personal use; not intended as an enterprise GIF pipeline

PlexGifMaker is a focused utility for Plex users who want a fast way to extract short, captioned GIFs from their media. It is lightweight, Docker-friendly, and suitable for homelab or personal media-server environments.

56stars
4forks

Why choose an open source alternative?

  • Data ownership: Keep your data on your own servers
  • No vendor lock-in: Freedom to switch or modify at any time
  • Cost savings: Reduce or eliminate subscription fees
  • Transparency: Audit the code and know exactly what's running