Dyrector

Best Self Hosted Alternatives to Dyrector

A curated collection of the 1 best self hosted alternatives to Dyrector.

Cloud-hosted continuous delivery and deployment platform for managing Docker containers and application releases. Offers a lightweight control panel, environment and stack configuration, multi-instance deployments, low-code CD workflows, and CI/cloud provider integrations.

Alternatives List

#1
Tugtainer

Tugtainer

Self-hosted web app to monitor Docker images and automate container updates across one or multiple hosts, with scheduling, per-container policies, and notifications.

Tugtainer is a self-hosted application that checks for new Docker images and helps you update containers through a web UI. It supports both manual and scheduled update flows and can manage multiple Docker hosts via an optional agent.

Key Features

  • Web UI dashboard with authentication
  • Scheduled checks/updates via cron-like scheduling
  • Per-container policy: ignore, check only, or auto-update
  • Multi-host management using a lightweight Tugtainer Agent
  • Safe grouping for updates (Docker Compose project grouping and custom dependency labels)
  • Optional Docker socket-proxy support to avoid mounting the Docker socket directly
  • Private registry support via mounted Docker config
  • Notifications via Apprise with templated messages
  • Manual and automatic image pruning

Use Cases

  • Keep homelab services updated while retaining per-service control
  • Centralize image monitoring and update operations for multiple Docker hosts
  • Receive notifications when updates are available without auto-updating critical containers

Limitations and Considerations

  • Automatic updates are disabled by default and must be explicitly enabled per container
  • Not recommended for production environments by the project
  • Containers marked as protected (and non-running containers) will be skipped during updates; the app/agent/socket-proxy themselves should not be auto-updated from within Tugtainer

Tugtainer fits well for users who want a UI-driven alternative to purely CLI-based update routines. It combines scheduled automation, dependency-aware update ordering, and flexible notification options to keep Docker workloads current with controlled risk.

1.1kstars
35forks

Why choose an open source alternative?

  • Data ownership: Keep your data on your own servers
  • No vendor lock-in: Freedom to switch or modify at any time
  • Cost savings: Reduce or eliminate subscription fees
  • Transparency: Audit the code and know exactly what's running