GitGuardian Honeytokens

Best Self Hosted Alternatives to GitGuardian Honeytokens

A curated collection of the 1 best self hosted alternatives to GitGuardian Honeytokens.

SaaS for generating and managing decoy secrets (API keys, tokens, credentials) that trigger alerts when used. Detects leaked or misused secrets, provides logging and alerting, and integrates with security and incident-response workflows.

Alternatives List

#1
Canarytokens

Canarytokens

Canarytokens generates honeytokens (URLs, files, credentials, docs) that alert you when an attacker touches them, helping detect breaches early.

Canarytokens screenshot

Canarytokens is a honeytoken service that lets you create “tripwires” (tokens) and place them in files, documents, credentials, and network locations to detect unauthorized access. When a token is triggered, it generates an alert so you can investigate potential compromise quickly.

Key Features

  • Generates multiple token types (for example: web/URL tokens, documents, credentials, and other bait artifacts)
  • Immediate alerting when a token is accessed, opened, or executed
  • Simple token management for creating, naming, and tracking deployed tokens
  • Designed to work as a lightweight breach-detection layer alongside existing security controls

Use Cases

  • Detect unauthorized access to internal file shares, documentation, or secrets
  • Place decoy links or documents to identify phishing or lateral movement
  • Monitor for misuse of planted credentials or high-value data locations

Limitations and Considerations

  • Tokens provide detection and investigation signals, not prevention or containment
  • Effectiveness depends on careful placement and operational follow-up when alerts trigger

Canarytokens is useful as a low-friction way to add early breach detection across common attacker touchpoints. It complements traditional monitoring by turning sensitive locations and decoy assets into actionable security alerts.

2.7kstars
393forks

Why choose an open source alternative?

  • Data ownership: Keep your data on your own servers
  • No vendor lock-in: Freedom to switch or modify at any time
  • Cost savings: Reduce or eliminate subscription fees
  • Transparency: Audit the code and know exactly what's running