Semaphore CI

Best Self Hosted Alternatives to Semaphore CI

A curated collection of the 5 best self hosted alternatives to Semaphore CI.

Cloud CI/CD service that automates building, testing, and deploying software via configurable pipelines and workflows. Features include parallel jobs, autoscaling runners, Docker/Kubernetes support, Git integrations, analytics, RBAC, CLI/API, and hybrid/self-hosted runners.

Alternatives List

#1
Semaphore UI

Semaphore UI

Open-source web UI and API for running Ansible, Terraform/OpenTofu, Bash, and PowerShell tasks with project isolation and access control.

Semaphore UI screenshot

Semaphore UI is a modern web UI for managing popular DevOps tools. It provides a clean interface to run tasks across tooling such as Ansible, Terraform/OpenTofu, Bash, and PowerShell with a focus on clarity and security.

Key Features

  • Easily run Ansible playbooks, Terraform/OpenTofu code, Bash, and PowerShell scripts. (github.com)
  • Receive notifications about failed tasks. (github.com)
  • Project isolation and granular access control. (semaphoreui.com)
  • Intuitive workflow and quick setup. (semaphoreui.com)

Use Cases

  • Orchestrate infrastructure automation with Ansible, Terraform/OpenTofu, and Bash. (github.com)
  • Manage multi-team deployments with project isolation and role-based access. (semaphoreui.com)
  • Track tasks with templates, schedules, and inventories to automate repetitive workloads. (github.com)

Limitations and Considerations

Conclusion

Semaphore UI is an open-source, modern UI for automating DevOps workflows. It combines a Go backend with a Vue.js front-end, runs in Docker/K8s, and supports common databases to fit existing environments. It is backed by an active open-source community and ongoing development. (semaphoreui.com)

13.1kstars
1.2kforks
#2
Komodo

Komodo

Komodo is a self-hosted build and deployment platform to automate builds and deploy Docker containers and Compose stacks across many servers with a web UI and API.

Komodo screenshot

Komodo is a build and deployment system designed to build software and deploy it across many servers from a central interface. It focuses on automating builds from Git repositories and managing Docker-based deployments with visibility into runtime status.

Key Features

  • Automated builds from Git repositories, including build triggers on Git push
  • Auto-versioned Docker image builds
  • Deploy and manage Docker containers and Docker Compose stacks across multiple servers
  • Centralized dashboard to monitor uptime and view logs across connected servers
  • API-driven automation with no fixed limit on the number of connected servers
  • Rust-based core API and periphery agent for server connectivity

Use Cases

  • Homelab or small-team CI/CD to build images and roll out Docker deployments to multiple hosts
  • Managing and updating Docker Compose application stacks across a fleet of servers
  • Centralized operations view for uptime and logs for containerized services

Limitations and Considerations

  • Oriented primarily around Docker and Docker Compose workflows; non-container deployment models may not fit as well
  • Provided without warranty; stability depends on your deployment practices and version selection

Komodo provides a practical, self-hostable way to automate builds and manage Docker deployments across many servers with a unified UI and automation-friendly API. It is well-suited for teams that want straightforward fleet deployment and monitoring without SaaS lock-in.

9.6kstars
258forks
#3
Woodpecker CI

Woodpecker CI

Woodpecker CI is an open source CI/CD system that runs pipelines in containers, supports multiple workflows per repo, and integrates with Git forges via webhooks.

Woodpecker CI screenshot

Woodpecker CI is a lightweight, extensible CI/CD engine for building, testing, and deploying software. It executes pipeline steps in containers and is designed to integrate with common Git forges using webhook-driven workflows.

Key Features

  • Container-based pipeline execution for isolated, reproducible builds
  • Multi-workflow support within a single repository, including dependent workflows
  • Plugin-based extensibility to add custom capabilities beyond standard images
  • Server/agent architecture to scale runners across multiple machines
  • Default SQLite storage for simple deployments

Use Cases

  • Automating build, test, and deployment pipelines for software projects
  • Running Docker-based CI jobs for monorepos with multiple independent workflows
  • Extending CI behavior with custom plugins for internal tooling and integrations

Limitations and Considerations

  • Focuses on containerized execution, so workloads requiring non-container runtimes may need additional runner customization

Woodpecker CI fits teams that want a straightforward CI/CD platform with a Docker-first execution model and strong extensibility. Its lightweight footprint and workflow flexibility make it suitable for homelabs through production deployments.

6.3kstars
508forks
#4
Semaphore

Semaphore

Semaphore is an open-source CI/CD platform to automate builds, tests, and deployments with YAML pipelines, parallel execution, and container-friendly workflows.

Semaphore screenshot

Semaphore is an open-source CI/CD platform that automates building, testing, and deploying software from your Git repositories. It provides a pipeline-based workflow designed for fast feedback, parallel execution, and modern container and Kubernetes-oriented setups.

Key Features

  • YAML-based pipeline configuration for repeatable CI/CD workflows
  • Parallel job execution to reduce build and test times
  • Support for containerized jobs and Kubernetes-oriented delivery workflows
  • Pipeline promotions and staged workflows for controlled releases
  • Access control features for organizing teams and permissions
  • CLI and API for automating CI/CD management programmatically

Use Cases

  • Continuous integration for teams that need fast test and build feedback
  • Continuous delivery pipelines with gated promotions to staging and production
  • Running automated checks and deployments for containerized and Kubernetes apps

Semaphore combines a developer-friendly pipeline experience with the operational flexibility needed to run CI/CD on your own infrastructure. It fits teams looking for a full CI/CD system with strong performance characteristics and automation primitives for delivery workflows.

1.4kstars
75forks
#5
SourceHut

SourceHut

SourceHut is an open source software development platform with Git/Mercurial hosting, continuous integration, mailing lists with code review, tickets, wikis, and more.

SourceHut screenshot

SourceHut is a suite of integrated tools for hosting and collaborating on software projects. It provides a minimal, performance-focused web UI and emphasizes standards-based workflows (notably email-driven collaboration).

Key Features

  • Hosted Git repositories with public, private, and unlisted visibility options
  • First-class Mercurial hosting alongside Git
  • Fine-grained access control, including access for users without accounts
  • Continuous integration with fully virtualized builds across multiple Linux distributions and BSDs
  • Ad-hoc CI jobs and post-build triggers (email, webhooks, etc.)
  • Mailing lists with web-based patch review tools and searchable, threaded archives
  • Focused ticket tracking with support for private/security bug reports and email participation
  • Markdown- and Git-driven wikis with flexible page organization
  • Account security features such as TOTP-based 2FA, audit logs, and PGP-signed/encrypted service email

Use Cases

  • Hosting open source projects that prefer email-based patch review workflows
  • Running CI for multi-platform builds (Linux and BSD) with reproducible, isolated environments
  • Managing project collaboration with integrated repos, tickets, wikis, and mailing lists

Limitations and Considerations

  • Designed around a minimalist UI and email/SSH-centric workflows, which may differ from PR-centric forges
  • The public service has historically been labeled as “alpha,” which may affect expectations around stability

SourceHut is well-suited to teams and communities that value simple interfaces, strong integrations, and standards-driven collaboration. It offers a cohesive set of tools for maintaining projects without relying on heavyweight, JavaScript-dependent web experiences.

Why choose an open source alternative?

  • Data ownership: Keep your data on your own servers
  • No vendor lock-in: Freedom to switch or modify at any time
  • Cost savings: Reduce or eliminate subscription fees
  • Transparency: Audit the code and know exactly what's running