Session

Best Self Hosted Alternatives to Session

A curated collection of the 6 best self hosted alternatives to Session.

Session is a privacy-focused, decentralized messaging app providing end-to-end encrypted 1:1 and group chats. It uses onion routing and a network of decentralized nodes, requires no phone number, and is designed to minimize metadata collection.

Alternatives List

#1
Tinode

Tinode

Tinode is an open source instant messaging platform with a Go backend, web/mobile clients, JSON WebSocket and gRPC APIs, and support for one-to-one and group chat.

Tinode screenshot

Tinode is a full-stack instant messaging platform designed for building modern chat applications. It provides a Go-based server, official clients for web and mobile, and APIs that support custom integrations such as chatbots and automated agents.

Key Features

  • One-to-one messaging, group chats, and broadcast-style channels with read-only subscribers
  • Real-time delivery, read receipts, typing indicators, and presence notifications
  • Rich message content: markdown-style formatting, inline media, and file attachments
  • Voice and video calls, plus voice messages
  • Granular per-topic access control and server-side blocking controls
  • Extensible architecture with plugins for features like moderation and chatbots
  • JSON over WebSocket (with optional long polling) and Protobuf over gRPC
  • Pluggable database layer with support for PostgreSQL, MySQL/MariaDB, and MongoDB
  • Media/file handling via local filesystem or S3-compatible storage backends

Use Cases

  • Building a custom consumer or community chat app (mobile + web)
  • Adding in-app messaging, support chat, or anonymous chat to a product
  • Developing bot-driven workflows and integrations using the messaging APIs

Limitations and Considerations

  • Federation and end-to-end encryption are listed as planned features and may not be available
  • Some advanced capabilities (for example, full-text message search) are planned rather than included by default

Tinode fits teams that want an embeddable messaging backend with strong real-time features and multiple official clients. Its API options and extensibility make it suitable for both standalone chat products and messaging features inside existing applications.

13kstars
2kforks
#2
SimpleX Chat

SimpleX Chat

Open-source, decentralized messaging network built on a Haskell core with Kotlin Multiplatform and native iOS clients; end-to-end encrypted messaging without user IDs.

SimpleX Chat screenshot

SimpleX Chat is an open-source, privacy-first messaging network designed to operate without any user identifiers. It provides mobile, desktop and terminal clients built on a Haskell core, delivering end-to-end encrypted messaging and group/community features while letting operators run their own servers.

Key Features

  • Messaging without user identifiers: the network is designed to deliver messages and form connections without persistent numeric or textual user IDs.
  • Strong encryption: double-ratchet end-to-end encryption with an additional encryption layer and local database encryption (SQLCipher/SQLite for device storage).
  • Haskell core with native UI bridges: a Haskell-based core library exposed to client UIs via FFI, used by Kotlin Multiplatform (Android/desktop) and native iOS (Swift) apps.
  • Multiple clients and runtimes: Android (Kotlin Multiplatform), iOS (Swift), desktop builds and a terminal/CLI client for Linux/macOS/Windows.
  • Flexible storage backends: SQLite (default for mobile/desktop) and PostgreSQL support for server-side deployments; storage abstraction via a unified store interface.
  • Extensible platform: bots API, SDKs and a directory service for discoverable communities and group moderation tools.
  • Cross-platform build tooling: builds and cross-compilation support using Cabal/Nix and Docker-based build scripts, with prebuilt packages distributed via Play Store, F‑Droid, TestFlight and direct APKs.

Use Cases

  • Private one-to-one messaging and group conversations where participants do not want persistent user identifiers.
  • Community-run groups and moderated communities using the SimpleX directory and community voucher model for server funding.
  • Developers building bots, automations or integrations using the provided bots API and client SDKs.

Limitations and Considerations

  • Platform/build complexity: the Haskell core and cross-compilation workflow make local builds more involved than typical native apps; building from source normally requires Haskell tooling, Nix or Docker images.
  • Mobile support constraints: historically builds targeted newer Android versions and specific CPU architectures; current official builds require modern mobile OS versions (Android 8+ minimum is documented) and some legacy devices may need experimental APKs.

SimpleX Chat is focused on strong privacy guarantees, decentralization and developer extensibility. It is suited for users and communities that require encrypted messaging without traditional identifiers and for developers who want to build bots or host community servers.

10.2kstars
545forks
#3
Tox

Tox

Tox is a decentralized, peer-to-peer communication system for encrypted messaging, voice/video calls, screen sharing, and file transfers without central servers.

Tox screenshot

Tox is a peer-to-peer (serverless) communication network and protocol used by messaging clients to provide private conversations without relying on central servers. It focuses on end-to-end encrypted chat and real-time audio/video features while keeping user identities based on cryptographic keys.

Key Features

  • Peer-to-peer networking without central servers for message routing
  • End-to-end encryption and authentication implemented via libsodium/NaCl primitives
  • Instant messaging with friend requests and contact-style identities (public-key based)
  • Encrypted voice and video calls (A/V support depends on client build)
  • Screen sharing and file sharing support in Tox clients
  • Group chats supported by the protocol and ecosystem clients

Use Cases

  • Private one-to-one messaging and calls without a hosted backend
  • Building custom bots or automation around the Toxcore client library API
  • Secure team or community group chats in environments where central servers are undesirable

Limitations and Considerations

  • The core library and network have historically been described as experimental and not formally audited as a complete system
  • Bootstrapping into the network requires known bootstrap nodes and proper client configuration

Tox is best viewed as the underlying protocol and core library (Toxcore) powering multiple desktop and mobile clients. It is a strong fit for users who want decentralized communications with modern encryption and a client ecosystem rather than a single hosted service.

2.5kstars
307forks
#4
RetroShare

RetroShare

RetroShare is a decentralized friend-to-friend platform for encrypted chat, mail, forums, channels and secure file sharing, with optional Tor/I2P support.

RetroShare screenshot

RetroShare is a cross-platform, decentralized friend-to-friend (F2F) communication suite designed for private and secure collaboration and sharing. It combines messaging, community features, and file distribution, with strong cryptography and optional anonymity layers.

Key Features

  • Friend-to-friend network model with secure connections between trusted peers
  • Encrypted chat (including chat rooms) and encrypted mail-style messaging with offline delivery
  • Secure file sharing with search and swarming transfers similar to BitTorrent
  • Decentralized forums, channels, and boards that can sync when peers come online
  • Optional operation over Tor or I2P to hide IP addresses (including builds that manage Tor)
  • Experimental VoIP and video calling via plugin

Use Cases

  • Private group communication and sharing for communities that prefer decentralized infrastructure
  • Secure file distribution to friends and wider network participants with reduced metadata exposure
  • Offline-capable discussions via decentralized forums that sync automatically when connected

Limitations and Considerations

  • The network is primarily trust-based (friend-to-friend); discovery and reach depend on peer connections
  • Some features (notably VoIP/video) are experimental and may be less mature than core messaging and sharing

RetroShare fits users who want an encrypted, peer-to-peer alternative to centralized chat and sharing platforms. Its combination of F2F trust, offline messaging, and optional Tor/I2P support makes it suitable for privacy-focused collaboration.

1.9kstars
302forks
#5
Databag

Databag

Self-hosted, lightweight federated messenger with end-to-end encrypted threads and optional WebRTC audio/video calling across independently hosted nodes.

Databag screenshot

Databag is a fast, lightweight self-hosted messenger designed to run on minimal hardware while still supporting modern messaging features. It is federated, allowing users on different independently hosted nodes to communicate directly with strong cryptographic identities and end-to-end encryption.

Key Features

  • Federated messaging between accounts on different nodes
  • Public/private key based identity that is not tied to a hosting domain
  • End-to-end encryption for sealed topics so the server admin cannot read content
  • Topic-based threads to organize conversations by subject
  • Unlimited participants in group threads
  • Low-latency push using WebSockets (avoids polling)
  • Optional audio and video calls using WebRTC (requires STUN/TURN for NAT traversal)
  • Multi-factor authentication via TOTP
  • Mobile push notifications (UnifiedPush, FCM, APN)

Use Cases

  • Private family or small-community messaging on a personal server or low-power device
  • Federated messaging between multiple organizations without a central provider
  • Secure group threads for projects where message privacy is required

Limitations and Considerations

  • WebRTC calls typically require configuring a STUN/TURN relay to work reliably behind NAT

Databag focuses on efficiency and decentralization while keeping the deployment simple enough for home servers. It fits best for users who want federated communication, end-to-end encryption, and optional calling without heavy infrastructure.

1.4kstars
92forks
#6
Jami

Jami

Jami is a distributed communication platform for private messaging, audio/video calls, and conferencing, designed to work without central servers and with end-to-end encryption.

Jami is a distributed communication platform for private messaging and real-time audio/video communication. It is designed to work without relying on central servers, aiming to keep user communications private and resilient.

Key Features

  • Peer-to-peer messaging and calling with a distributed architecture
  • Audio and video calls, including multi-party conferencing
  • End-to-end encryption for communications
  • Account creation without phone numbers and support for multiple devices
  • Contact management and conversation history synchronization between devices

Use Cases

  • Private team or family communication without depending on centralized services
  • Secure voice/video calling for communities with unreliable infrastructure
  • Self-managed communications for organizations with strict privacy requirements

Jami is a strong choice for users who want a privacy-respecting communications app with a decentralized design. It combines everyday chat and calling features with an architecture intended to reduce reliance on third-party servers.

Why choose an open source alternative?

  • Data ownership: Keep your data on your own servers
  • No vendor lock-in: Freedom to switch or modify at any time
  • Cost savings: Reduce or eliminate subscription fees
  • Transparency: Audit the code and know exactly what's running